• I live in The United States of America
  • My occupation is Astrophysicist (student)
  • I am male


Was wondering why did you revert that edit, so I see now. Carry on. Energy X 21:54, June 14, 2014 (UTC)

Bugs Edit

Bugs that are marked as verified do not get removed, if they are fixed the patch that they were fixed with can be listed as an addendum to the bug, however the bug does not get removed. Richie9999 (talk) 00:26, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

I see you are changing things like "PC" to "Pc". That is unnecessary. Please don't makes senseless edits like these. RangerSequoia "Some say this user is a Moderator..." Wiki 00:34, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
Whether or not it made sense isn't relevant. If it's marked as verified that means that more than one user experienced that bug, no matter how nonsensical. If you can dig back through the history of the page and find that a user self verified the bug (posted it and then marked it as verified) it's perfectly ok to change it to verification needed. Once a bug has been verified by more than on person, however, it stays. If you wish to rewrite the bugs that don't make much sense so that they make more sense while still conveying the message of the bug, that's ok, however, removing verified bugs is not. Richie9999 (talk) 00:40, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
You might just find that some, no matter how outlandish, are legitimate. Richie9999 (talk) 00:51, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Linking and you! Edit

When linking try to link directly to the relevant article, for example, I removed your link on Chevron's page as Clothing links to an overview page for ALL clothing in the entire series, as it is extremely doubtful that Chevron is wearing all of it, a link directly to the relevant item of clothing is needed. The same goes for your link on Milt's page, which linked to a disambiguation page for Raiders. Specificity in links is important. Just thought I'd let ya know. Richie9999 (talk) 03:13, June 16, 2014 (UTC)

BTW the subject name is supposed to read like a cheesy old PSA. Richie9999 (talk) 03:19, June 16, 2014 (UTC)

Good jobEdit

It's always good to see new faces around here, and especially when they edit a lot! If you could use help on something or have any question, you can always contact me on my TP or in chat. Keep up the good work! :) - Greets Peace'n Hugs (talk) (blog) 08:32, June 17, 2014 (UTC)

Player HousesEdit

See the talk page of Player Houses please, there is something way more incorrect happening there, aside from grammar nazi wars (capitalizations). Why does Jspoelstra sees presence of enemies in the house as a POSITIVE thing?.. 01:15, July 18, 2014 (UTC)



I wanted to discuss why you think Massachusetts should be removed. I agree it is redundant with New England Commonwealth, but I disagree that the current canon is the NECW not the MCW. Fallout 4 seems to point to the MCW in game, not NECW. I suspect this is a re-write of canoon.

Scottr529 (talk) 06:59, December 31, 2015 (UTC)

The page simply added nothing which other pages haven't already noted. What it had to do with canon is irrelevant, unless you would like to explain why you think otherwise. -TragicShow

Then, perhaps, The New England CW page should be re-named the Massachusetts Commonwealth. I agree, I'm just not sure how this should be approached

Scottr529 (talk) 07:06, December 31, 2015 (UTC)

If you feel like that's the correct course of action, go ahead. -TragicShow

Image size Edit

Define "standard size". They shrink down to 250px wide for the infobox regardless of how big I make them, but I'm not gonna make pictures 250x250, that's just too small. Obviously I'm not uploading 2k pictures, but how big do you think is too big? And which pictures are we talking about here? Misc items? Clothing? I need more to go on here. --Xernoc (talk) 07:14, December 31, 2015 (UTC)

For example, the picture you added for the Holly (Fallout 4) page is significantly larger, than say the one on Brian Virgil -TragicShow

The infoboxes have been redone since the previous standard was established. I discussed the images with Jspolestra before uploading them and they haven't discussed a new standard yet. If anything we need a longer photo of Virgil, in my opinion. --Xernoc (talk) 07:25, December 31, 2015 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.