Greetings, TechnoCrusader, and welcome to the Fallout Wiki!
It appears to be your turn to present your side here.
Hello! I did not realize you were HuskyMarauder ^_^ I was just thinking to myself how I hadn't seen you around for a bit, only now I realize that I have, but under a different name. Sorry, I guess I just wanted to say that I am pleased you are still around! I do have a question, if I may: Is your other information still the same? If I recall correctly, you were on Xbox One. To note for Fandom's Terms of Services, I am not asking for any information, only if it remains the same. I had meant to add you (if that's okay) before, just didn't get to it yet! Regards, Hexonith (talk) 03:12, January 9, 2020 (UTC)
BoS (East Coast) Edit
Hey, appreciate what you did with the BoS page, even if it was reverted due to a subjective reason. That being said, to quote your post of "I understand that the Brotherhood is not actually religious at all, seeing as being religious originally meant worshiping a single (or multiple) supernatural beings and/or controlling powers.", I would argue that their numerous descriptions of being techno-religious, or otherwise quasi-religious would make them religious, as they believe technology is a controlling power, and attempt to harness it or seal it away from others, for better or worse results. Of course, the BoS as a whole is in need of updating from The Vault, or at least subsections of it are, so that could be an influence on future updates on trivia, BTS (Behind-The-Scenes) information, or otherwise lore/game-related facts. Just my two cents on the matter. JCB2077 (talk) 14:12, January 16, 2020 (UTC)
Nothing much has changed in really in regards to the merge other than articles porting over, but I'm hopeful for a complete overhaul of the site and layout to make things more modern. But other than that, I've been completely happy with the merge so far, and thank you again. Devastating DaveZIP ZAP RAP 18:44, January 16, 2020 (UTC)
Talk Page and /D stuff
So I suppose the first note is that, as stated elsewhere, this is where personal messages can be sent. Second would be Discord. You are correct in that I removed you as a "friend" on Discord, but not that it was a result of the debate on Fallout sources regarding race/species. We have not spoken in quite awhile and hearing your accusation that I am the reason veteran users leave the wiki was very disheartening. You're a /d user, which means I'll always be around to address any concerns you send my way, but I cannot consider you a "friend" on social media. Because frankly, that exclamation was quite shocking and disrespectful. Sorry. Saxhleel12 (talk) 19:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
As I stated before, I don't feel the need to use a talk page to discuss something with a /d mod that quite frankly behaved in a petty and temerarious way considering the position and the example that /d mods should be setting, a reaction which was quite frankly unprovoked and the only rational explanation I can find is that you had your reservations about me beforehand.
The comment concerning veteran users leaving was taken out of context, just like my entire discussion point on the /d post in question, in that it was a blanket "If this is how even YOU are starting to behave when presented with criticism, no wonder the old faces are leaving". As in, if one of the /d mods that I have respected for this long has also decided to stoop to that level, then no wonder the old faces have given up, sure. Apologies if I hadn't made that clear, however since to be honest for quite a while I have seen no real evidence to the contrary when it comes to your debating and open-minded consideration of points you don't agree with, that's the conclusion I am going to make based off of that interaction.
Nevertheless, I felt over these last three years that I've known you on the wiki, that you have been an incredibly positive force on /d and I hope it continues, but your display in that interaction and the way that you behaved is blatantly indicative now to me that no, we are not "friends", and the feeling is mutual. TechnoCrusader (talk) 20:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Edit: A more elaborate reply has been placed on your talk page as a result of comment edits since the discussion, which implicate (via your edit) my statement to be a "shocking personal accusation", which is simply either a misunderstanding, or an embellished and disingenuous portrayal of what I said. TechnoCrusader (talk) 16:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
About My Ban...
Hello there. I have been given messages that include much of the discussion surrounding my unjust ban from the Discord earlier today. Isaw that you approve of the ban, and considering what information you have, I don't blame you. I didn't even realize the full scope of what occured myself until Dyre brought up the fact that I allegedly DMed some nasty crap to Kate earlier today. Well, I have proof that I did not send anything to Kate within the past few weeks. I tried DMing you on Discord and screen sharing said proof with you earlier, but you blocked me. Nevertheless, I trust you more than I trust Kate and Dyre, so if you would like to see this proof, send my a friend request on Discord and I can explain further. I brought this up to you above the others because I see that you are committed against corrupt actions in the wiki as a whole, and I believe you are one of the few staff members that would be willing to view this information as well as act appropriately with said information. I am going to sleep immediately after I send this message, so I will not be able to show it to you until tomorrow. I will have a few hours in the morning where I will be available, but following that I will be on the road for a few hours and won't be available again until the evening. If you would like to see this proof, evidence that I believe fully clears my name in the matter, please let me know. - Sigmund Fraud Talk Contributions 06:31, 28 November 2021 (UTC)