Fallout Wiki
Advertisement
Fallout Wiki
Forums: Index > Wiki proposals and applications > Discussions Moderator Request-Overseer X

Hey everybody, I am pretty sure most of the active ones would know me, and now, I am going to throw my hat in the ring for discussions moderator. I joined more than 2 years ago and have enjoyed my time here.

I hope to help the community become a friendlier and more welcoming environment. Since I am in a diff time zone than most, i am able to cover the period of times where most moderators are inactive, and also be that someone who can connect with the community. And as seeing that there has been a shortage of active moderators, I hope you would consider my request. Overseer X (talk) 23:21, August 15, 2018 (UTC)

Endorsement

Overseer is one of the more positive contributors on discussions. He regularly reports posts that violate the policies and conducts himself in a manner appropriate with others, helping keep things in line with policy without minimodding himself. I feel confident he will be able to handle the responsibilities of Discussions Moderator just fine and, as we are a little light in moderator coverage at the moment, the help will be much appreciated. The Gunny  UserGunny chevrons 23:30, August 15, 2018 (UTC)


Votes

Yes

  1. Yes X seems like a very responsible person and I believe that he'd be a good moderator.Blue (talk) 05:38, August 16, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Yes He's been around for a very long time and is familiar with the rules. I'd like to see him around more often, but I'm sure as a discussions mod he would have no issue with checking the board often on his phone. - Chris With no background 23:43, August 15, 2018 (UTC)
  3. Yes he is nice, and i think he is adept for the job. --Obamacat.ind (talk) 23:49, August 15, 2018 (UTC)
  4. Yes he is the overseer after all. --Gato-libre (talk) 00:01, August 16, 2018 (UTC)
  5. Yes If he likes talking with other fans and can cover things other admins can't, then OVERSEER X ALL THE WAY. Tiger60f2
  6. Yes I told you to increase your presence and roll out the welcome wagon. Despite the naysayers below, your post history proves you did these things. Your presence, or absence in discord should be irrelevant as it’s not part of the post. Agent c (talk) 13:28, August 16, 2018 (UTC)
  7. Yes He seems like he’d be ok. Bloodworm (talk) 15:56, August 16, 2018 (UTC)
  8. Yes From what I've seen it's fairly apparent we need more moderation on /d. You seem pretty active and I think you'll be able to handle yourself. Hopefully you'll also be interested in listening to the advice of more experienced moderators. The different timezone is also a plus as our current team of moderators are mostly (if not all) in the same timezone. Discord presence is a plus and I hope you'll be there more often going forward but, as Agent c said, your discord presence is irrelevant to this vote. DisgustingWastelander (talk) 22:02, August 16, 2018 (UTC)
  9. Yes I remember almost every /d user and most of all I remember users I spoke with during interesting threads; Overseer was one of them. I like the guy, he seems responsible and why the hell we should not give him a chance. With fallout 76 releasing in November you'll be able to see if he's skilled for the job or not with so many users flowing to the /d wall during that period. Good luck with the vote, pal. Brotherhood Sentinel Alex (talk) 22:15, August 16, 2018 (UTC)NCR Ranger Alex
  10. Yes While I ultimately agree with some points brought up by those voting no, I believe we need new moderators, and you just happen to be running User:Saxhleel12 2:32, August 17, 2018 (UTC)
  11. Yes Now I know I may not be so active anymore but I do take a gander at /d every so often and I’ve seen your recent increase in activity which I think was your main flaw with the last request. So you have my vote. Quarterman812 (talk)
  12. Yes I don't have much to say here, other than that the d/ clearly needs new active moderators evident by the recent surge in activity due to the Fallout 76 announcement, and I'm sure you'd do a great job. 123123abcabc (talk) 19:23, August 17, 2018 (UTC)
  13. Yes I'm updating my vote to yes as I feel that /d desperately needs more moderating staff, and I don't have any major opposition to OSX, so here's a vote. One thing though OSX: please use Discord some more. |\| () |\/| /\ |) | Talk | Discord | NMC 01:11, August 21, 2018 (UTC)
  14. Yes I believe that X can be a great discussions moderator and that he is a qualified person to do the job which is why I vote yes. Asghetti (talk) 18:25, August 21, 2018 (UTC)

No

  1. No personally, the issues with his last vote again appear here for me as well. I rarely even see him on discussions and haven't for a long time. Maybe he just lurks in the shadows reporting (which seems to be the case) but he still doesn't pop on enough to justify giving him the dmod toolset in my opinion. An endorsement from gunny is saying alot, but my opinions stay this way. I do think we need 1 or more active dmods with saka gone, but this user does not fit that bill in my opinion. silentWraith_291 {♤Niner Ace of Spades♤} (talk) 23:51, August 15, 2018 (UTC)
  2. No Nothing against X, nor Gunny, but I haven’t seen consistent activity from X on the discussions board in ages. Maybe he just lurks and reports, which is fine. But I’d rather that he be a participating member of the board. Additionally, I’ve seen the way he moderates Discord servers and I don’t necessarily like his style. Not to mention none of his “yes” votes are from active members of discussions. And “different time zone” isn’t a good reason to run in my opinion. Laat the Survivor (talk) 00:54, August 16, 2018 (UTC)
  3. No Pedro Washington (talk) 01:05, August 16, 2018 (UTC)
  4. No For real now, i haven't seem X in a while anywhere, nor /d and he barely shows up on the Discord server (not that everyone should be there but you know what i mean). I can't see why an user that's lurking for months should be a /d mod. Sorry X. Dragão Carmesim Red hammer and sickle 01:10, August 16, 2018 (UTC)
  5. No I haven’t really see you moderate and I’m don’t think you’d be a good one. I’m sorry, but that’s how I feel. Acj1225
  6. No --UrbanAnge1 (talk) 11:48, August 16, 2018 (UTC)
  7. No The jarring caveat that is debilitating me voting yes is the following: I haven't seen Overseer X active, neither on the /d or Discord - a fundamental element that, for me, is mandatory for an effective Discussion Moderator. Despite how I perceive the candidate as an cordial and affable user in the community, I believe the position would be suitable for a different user, one that is industrious and devoted. Moreover, I haven't witnessed the moderating abilities of the candidate, thus me voting yes would have been a judgement of unequivocal certitude - and I, candidly, don't know the candidate enough to warrant that. --Ulysses the G (talk) 12:54, August 16, 2018 (UTC)
  8. No I remember when you ran 2 years ago, and unfortunately the same situation has happened here. User:Ianthebean

Neutral

  1. Neutral I scarcely ever use discussions here. If you used NP's Discord a lot of users who don't use discussions would know you better. In conclusion, I chose neutral because I don't know you. Jgrsoto (talk) 00:11, August 16, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Neutral I rarely see you on, and when you are, its mainly on discord. Your a great guy, and deserve this position, but you should be more active MrGamerson (talk) 15:08, August 16, 2018 (UTC)
  3. NeutralI Don't think that I hold much grip to rilly say yes or no B9r3rlands (talk) 01:03, August 21, 2018 (UTC)

Excluded votes

  1. Yes i just like voting yes, also X is a very nice dude Dragão Carmesim Red hammer and sickle 00:10, August 16, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Yes OVERSEER X FOR LIFE!!! User not logged in
  3. Neutral I agree with Soto. I don't use /d often at all, and I can't know you because I only really use Discord for chatting with fellow NPs. You seem friendly enough, and I'd be glad to give you an upvote, but I cannot do so confidently until I see you around Discord more often. Sidenote: My opinion was basically the same last year for the same reason. |\| () |\/| /\ |) | Talk | Discord | NMC 14:05, August 16, 2018 (UTC) - Vote changed.

Comments

I see a lot of the votes are running along the same lines as the last request. I know you might have felt I was being unfair when I declined to endorse you in past, but this is why. Sakaratte - Talk to the catmin 07:35, August 16, 2018 (UTC)

Result

This was close enough that I want to discuss it with the other Bureaucrats before we post the result. Stay tuned. The Gunny  UserGunny chevrons 01:04, August 23, 2018 (UTC)

Request has passed. Congrats. The Gunny  UserGunny chevrons 15:57, August 24, 2018 (UTC)
Advertisement