Forum:Bureaucrat Request - GhostAvatar

Forums: Index > Wiki discussion > Bureaucrat Request - GhostAvatar

Due to the shortage of bureaucrat presence and activity level at present (due to personal and professional obligations), I feel there is a need for an additional bureaucrat to be added to the ranks. As such, I would like to put myself forward in the same process as in a admin request.

For those who are new and unaware of me, I include below a link to my previous admin request (not much has changed). Plus additional links that may be helpful in a person decision.

• Forum:Adminship Request - GhostAvatar
• Special:Editcount/GhostAvatar
• Special:Contributions/GhostAvatar

Poll finished on 1:21 am September 4, 2011 (UTC).

• A consensus must be reached by voting before any action is taken.
• You can vote by placing one of the following lines in the appropriate section:
  • Use # {{yes}} ~~~~ if you support the proposal.
  • Use # {{no}} ~~~~ if you are against the proposal.
  • Use # {{neutral}} ~~~~ if you wish to abstain.
• Please do not edit other user's votes.

Votes

• Of course. Ghost has been working super hard here at the ole Vault, and deserves this. BILLYOCEAN 01:24, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
• Most definitely. He's been working very hard for the Vault, and more importantly, has the (technical) qualities, insight and think level of a bureaucrat. Jspoel 01:46, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
• Ghost reminds me of Goth in a number of ways, and I don't see how making him a bureaucrat is a bad thing. On the other hand, I don't really see why we need another bureaucrat; IIRC, the only difference between admin and bureau is the ability to switch other user priviledges, yes? Ausir at least has been pretty good at keeping up on requests. Nitty ^Tok. 02:11, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

I would like to point out that items like Forum:Sister Wiki request - The Wasteland Survival Guide are still waiting an official verdict. While I realise there isn't much in the way of additional tools with the position. The request is more in-regard to supporting The Vault and the bureaucrats in these administrative roles. 02:22, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

• We only have 3... 4 cant hurt Agent c 02:30, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
• Why wouldn't I? EB^Talk 02:42, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
• Ofcourse. You deserve it more than anybody on the Vault. Best wishes More Cowbell :) 03:00, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
• Most certainly. You're bureaucrat material. 08:01, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
• He is the first guy to help me in this wiki,he certainly worth it.(Vvardenfell 08:03, August 28, 2011 (UTC))
• Hell yes I think ghost will make a great bureaucrat, unlike some of the admins or chat mods, he isn't biased whatsoever. User:Denis517
• Of course, ive seen Ghost Avatar Bot doining alot of work on the wiki and he would make an excellent Bureaucrat.The Netherealm awaits for you 09:38, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
• I think that Ghost has the technological ability and presence enough to be bumped up this little bit more. He is always around to help out and so he will be able to fit nicely as a new bureaucrat. The bot does a lot of good, and Ghost is around a lot of the time doing more admin and bureaucrat style work than most.
• I suppose another bureaucrat wouldn't hurt. Gears of duty
• As I said, I would vote yes even if your application was an essay about my incompetence. You deserve it. Scar: "Say 'ello to my little friend!" 10:48, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
• I cannot in good faith vote yes on this. http://imageshack.us/m/15/6929/luckmanngrenadesignatur.png Luckmann 11:21, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
• 100% yes. JASPER//"Do you like hurting other people?" 11:38, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
• Great. GobTheGoul (talk) 15:10, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

P.S. Forgot to add, even if I may seem to be inactive or less active, this is because I am working on the bot (User:GhostAvatarBot). 01:33, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

• We need an active bureaucrat, the other three are too busy with work. Forum threads are waiting too long for a decision; the one Avatar pointed out and also the Forum:Wiki moderators. Jspoel 13:48, August 28, 2011 (UTC)