It seems that those pages reference an earlier debacle where Chris said the same thing.

Unfortunately they are talking about an unverified correspondence, the only thing that survived is a screenshot.

The tweet is still accessible on Avellone account, so I think it would maybe count as a more valid source.

Yes, I think that should be added to the page. Ideally with an archived link to the tweet so we still have it if it ever gets deleted.

I tried to add the link to the wayback machine.

https://web.archive.org/web/20200620170812/https://twitter.com/ChrisAvellone/status/1008114190639251456

Ehh he has a tendency to be kind of wrong

He is still a primary source, however, and shows the intent of the developers.

Besides, we already had this information on the wiki, this is just official confirmation.

Fair enough, a tweet is probably a better source than private correspondence.