Depends on the people.

.

This wiki is a lot better than many others, and we have fairly strict guidelines to keep it that way.

Also I think its a weird to ask the Fallout community if the Fallout community is toxic.

^^ I think your lost, the Elder Scrolls wiki is that way.

Here we argue to the death about the Brotherhood of Steel. And have single-player game elitists.

^Really? that true? But aren't all FO games aside from 76 SP?

Didn't Tactics have some sort of multiplayer?

But I get what you mean. Still, tthere has long been a stigma against multiplayer being pitched for Fallout. Back in the day, when the “what do you hope to see in Fallout 4” posts were coming around, it was an uphill battle even suggesting optional coop in the open world. People heard “multiplayer” and at the time, the gut reaction from detractors was not being upset over a M(ini)MO, it was jumping to the conclusion that multiplayer always and only meant turning Fallout into CoD.

Oh I see.

A two-player coop story would have been great, and would probably work better than a Mini-MMO.

Tactics did have multiplayer. I don’t think it was very popular, but then again not a lot about that game was popular.

Some people are toxic about people liking fallout 3 in any way but mostly the community is fine